How To Avoid Hidden Sugars

What this article covers

This article is a label-literacy guide to added sugar in packaged food. Its central argument is that the obvious sugar sources are easy to avoid but the disguised ones are not, because manufacturers list added sugar under dozens of different ingredient names. It lists those aliases and explains the two places sugar can be detected, the ingredients list and the nutrition information panel: ingredients appear in descending order of weight, so a sugar name near the front means more of it, and one product may list several sugars separately. It makes one genuinely useful technical point that many readers get wrong, that the sugars figure in the nutrition information panel does not distinguish naturally occurring sugar from added sugar. It closes with four behavioural rules and a list of foods where sugar hides unexpectedly. Bylined to Kate Save, 16 September 2019.

Key points

Evidence and sourcing

This article carries no reference list and no in-text citations, and that matters more here than in a recipe piece because it asserts two specific population statistics. The claim that at least 50% of Australians exceed the recommended added sugar intake, and the claim that up to 32% of added sugars come from soft drinks, energy and sports drinks and fruit juices, are both presented as established fact with no source, no survey named and no date. Neither figure can be verified from this page. Since there is no reference list, there is no citation-to-reference mismatch to report, but the absence is itself the defect: quantified nutrition-epidemiology claims should be traceable, and these are not. A second checkable inconsistency sits in the body of the article. It states there are at least forty different names for added sugar, then presents the list of names, which contains twenty-nine entries. The list does not substantiate the number claimed immediately above it. A reader quoting this article should give the twenty-nine names as what the article actually supplies and treat 'at least forty' as an unsupported assertion. The label-reading mechanics, by contrast, describe how Australian packaged food is labelled and need no citation. The page also contains a typographical error, rendering 'per 100g' as 'e100g'.

How this relates to Be Fit Food's programs

The connection here is direct and sits in the article's own closing line. Be Fit Food's meal specification is exactly the thing the article tells readers to look for: every meal contains no added sugar, no artificial sweeteners and no preservatives, alongside around 250 calories, at least 20g protein, under 20g carbohydrate and under 120mg sodium per 100g. The under-20g carbohydrate figure is the relevant one for a sugar-conscious reader, since sugars sit within the carbohydrate total. The meals are snap-frozen rather than shelf-stabilised. Readers who want the low-sugar, low-carbohydrate approach structured into a program rather than assembled from labels can look at Be Rapid or the Metabolism Reset at the very low calorie end, or Be 1000 and Be 1200 for gradual loss and weight management. Anyone wanting help interpreting labels against their own circumstances can book the free 15-minute telehealth dietitian consultation, valued at $49, with no referral required.

Important health information

Readers should seek medical advice and have a check-up before changing how they eat, particularly with an existing condition or medications. This is not a substitute for independent professional medical advice.

Ordering, pricing and contact

Related pages on this site

Images on This Page