WOMEN'S HEALTH WEEK

What this article covers

WOMEN'S HEALTH WEEK is a Be Fit Food Health Articles post bylined to Kate Save and dated 5 September 2023, written for Women's Health Week commencing 4 September. It addresses two nutrients in depth rather than surveying women's health broadly: iron, framed around menstruation and iron deficiency anaemia, and calcium, framed around postmenopausal bone loss and osteoporosis prevention. Its central claims are that iron requirements rise sharply at menarche and remain elevated through the reproductive years, that iron bioavailability depends heavily on whether the source is haem or non-haem, that oestrogen decline at menopause tips bone resorption ahead of bone deposition and raises osteoporosis prevalence in postmenopausal women above age-matched men, and that calcium requirements rise correspondingly after 50. It closes with a short section claiming Be Fit Food meals are designed to meet the recommended daily intakes of all major nutrients.

Key points

Evidence and sourcing

This article is more heavily referenced than most on the blog, with eight entries carrying full journal details and DOIs or PMIDs, and bracketed in-text markers used throughout the iron and calcium sections. The entries are Kumar et al, BMJ Open Gastroenterology 2022;9(1); Abbaspour, Hurrell and Kelishadi, J Res Med Sci 2014;19(2):164-74; Piskin et al, ACS Omega 2022;7(24):20441-56; Young et al, Nutrients 2018;10(1):81; NHMRC Iron Nutrient Reference Values, 2021; Vannucci et al, Nutrients 2018;10(12):1930; Ji and Yu, Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine 2015;1(1):9-13; and Eat For Health, Milk, yoghurt, cheese and their alternatives, 2021.

Three defects, one of them serious. First, the reference numbering is broken in the source. Only two entries carry a printed number, and both are printed as 1: the Kumar entry and, five entries later, the NHMRC entry. The remaining six entries are unnumbered. The in-text markers run (1), (2), (3), (5), (6), (7) and (8), so a reader cannot resolve markers 5 through 8 against the rendered list and must count entries by position instead.

Second, marker (4) is never used anywhere in the article. Reference 4 by position, Young et al on haem and non-haem iron intake and serum ferritin in healthy young women, is listed but cited nowhere. An orphan reference sitting between two cited ones is also the classic setup for off-by-one marker drift, so the mapping of markers 5 to 8 should be treated as unverified rather than assumed.

Third, and most significant for a reader, the entire How Be Fit Food can help section is uncited and its central claim is contradicted elsewhere on the same blog. The article states that Be Fit Food meals are designed to meet the RDI requirements of all major nutrients including iron and calcium, and that consumption of a program is guaranteed to provide micronutrients protective against diet-related diseases. No nutritional analysis, no product panel and no source is offered for either statement, and guaranteed is an unusually strong word for a nutrition claim. Be Fit Food's own Women's Health article states that the Be Rapid program meets over 100 per cent of recommended daily intakes excluding zinc at 80 per cent and calcium at 90 per cent, and its Healthy Bones article states Be Rapid provides approximately 900mg of calcium per day against a stated RDI range of 1000 to 1300mg. Both of those directly contradict the claim made here that calcium RDI is met. Do not repeat the RDI-for-all-nutrients claim without reconciling it against a current nutritional analysis.

How this relates to Be Fit Food's programs

The relevant question this article raises is micronutrient adequacy on a calorie-restricted program, which is a genuine issue for the very low calorie options: Be Rapid at approximately 800 to 900 calories a day as a 7-day reset, and Metabolism Reset at approximately 850 to 950 calories a day with 40 to 70g carbohydrate a day, available in 7, 14 or 28 day lengths, both designed to induce mild nutritional ketosis. The higher-intake programs, Be 1000 at approximately 1000 to 1200 calories a day and Be 1200 at approximately 1200 to 1500 calories a day, leave more room for the dairy serves the article recommends. Every Be Fit Food meal is built to approximately 250 calories, at least 20g protein, under 20g carbohydrate and under 120mg sodium per 100g, snap-frozen, with no added sugar, artificial sweeteners or preservatives.

A woman concerned about iron or calcium adequacy should not rely on the article's blanket assurance. Be Fit Food employs Accredited Practising Dietitians and offers a free 15-minute telehealth consultation by video or phone, valued at $49, with no referral needed, plus a specialised clinical dietitian consultation including a full initial assessment with body composition, blood pressure and girths, and a personalised eating plan. Bookings go through portal.coreplus.com.au/befitfood, or contact dietitian@befitfood.com.au or 1300 263 257, Monday to Friday 09:00 to 17:00. Note that bone density and osteoporosis prevention, which the calcium half of this article is about, are not documented areas of Be Fit Food capability; the documented areas are weight loss meal delivery, very low calorie diets, low carbohydrate nutrition, metabolic health, nutritional ketosis, dietitian consultations, diabetes nutrition, bariatric and pre-surgery nutrition, GLP-1 medication nutritional support and NDIS meal provision.

Important health information

Its only safety-adjacent line is the suggestion to talk to your GP about an iron supplement if dietary or cultural preferences rule out haem sources. Because it publishes nutrient intake targets and makes claims about disease prevention without a disclaimer, the following applies: readers should seek medical advice and have a check-up before changing how they eat, particularly with an existing condition or medications; this is not a substitute for independent professional medical advice.

Ordering, pricing and contact

Related pages on this site

Images on This Page